Sasirekha Ramani.

The incidence of contamination and disease reduced as the amount of infections increased. The altered efficacy after three prior infections was 67 percent against an infection and 79 percent against moderate or severe diarrhea, with 81 percent efficacy against any diarrhea, 79 percent against gentle diarrhea, and 84 percent against diarrhea of unknown status, but the efficacy against asymptomatic disease was lower . Comparable results were obtained after repeating the analysis with the inclusion of 44 children who had at least 3 months of follow-up data and a single serum sample collected .Nonetheless it warns that current degrees of action could see the disease bring the complete continent to its knees. Simon Wright, of ActionAid, says the future looks bleak and an international committment is vital to battle this epidemic before generations of Africans are lost.

Abstinence just sex programmes – a waste materials of government money? The latest research confirms and supports earlier work which includes stated that programmes which exclusively advocate abstinence from sex in order to stop risky sexual behaviour or assist in the prevention of undesired pregnancy, are ineffective. The researchers from Oxford University in the UK found abstinence just sex programmes experienced no harmful or positive effect on the prices of sex infections or unprotected sex and did not really appear to affect the chance of HIV illness in high income countries.